Live-in employees at risk in mushroom factory
Posted on April 25th 2012
Many liability insurance policyholders worry about accidentally breaking health and safety rules. Not so for Suffolk Mushrooms Ltd, who openly flouted the rules and put the lives of employees at serious risk in doing so.
On an official visit, the Health and Safety Executive were surprised to find Suffolk Mushrooms housing 37 of their employees in a disused office block, unfit for habitation. To make matters worse, the block had an unsafe gas boiler that hadn't been granted a landlord's gas safety certificate and could have caused serious loss of life.
It didn't end there. While most liability insurance claims are often the result of minor infringements, Suffolk Mushrooms Limited clearly wanted to really push the limits of health and safety.
For a start, their forklift truck drivers were untrained and equipment was towed without any towing equipment; unless you count a piece of rope. Large vehicles were also driven between mushroom growing sheds where people were walking. Basically, it was an accident waiting to happen.
HSE Inspector John Claxton explained: "Suffolk Mushrooms invested more than £1.5m in refurbishing its factory and mushroom growing equipment, yet failed to spend even a few hundred pounds to keep its employees safe. The workers were from Eastern Europe and most were unable to speak good English, and so were vulnerable to this type of exploitation."
They'll need every penny of their liability insurance after being found guilty for breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. They were fined £10,750 and will be required to pay the £8,446.05 court costs.
Related links
Other liability insurance news stories
Liability news archive
Catch up with all our previous liability insurance news stories in the news archive
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013







